AgriSA
OverviewAAMPMethodologyValue ChainSubsectorsStakeholdersTimelineCompareData QualitySimulator
2012 — 2024
How we score
AgriSA

South Africa's transparent, drillable, agriculture-rooted Food Security Index.

Dashboard

National OverviewProvince ComparisonValue ChainSubsectorsHistorical TimelineData Quality

Resources

MethodologyAAMP ScorecardStakeholders

Coverage

9 provinces6 measured pillars23 indicators2012 — 2024
© 2026 AgriSA. All rights reserved.Methodology, weights, and data sources published for full transparency.
Back to National Overview
G

Governance

Weight: 5%

Measures institutional governance quality including corruption control, political stability, regulatory quality, and agricultural insurance coverage.

71.9/ 100Excellent86%High

Indicator Breakdown

Click any indicator to drill down

Score by Indicator

Agricultural Insurance

Missing
0.0Weight: 14%
0/0 data pointsNaN%
View indicator detail

Control of Corruption

Active
67.0Weight: 14%
9/9 data points100%
View indicator detail

Government Effectiveness

Active
71.2Weight: 14%
9/9 data points100%
View indicator detail

Political Stability

Active
77.7Weight: 14%
9/9 data points100%
View indicator detail

Regulatory Quality

Active
69.5Weight: 14%
9/9 data points100%
View indicator detail

Rule of Law

Active
72.8Weight: 14%
9/9 data points100%
View indicator detail

Voice & Accountability

Active
70.4Weight: 14%
9/9 data points100%
View indicator detail

Province Heatmap

Governance scores across 9 provinces
MetricECFSGPKZNLPMPNWNCWC
Agricultural Insurance000000000
Control of Corruption676767676767676767
Government Effectiveness717171717171717171
Political Stability787878787878787878
Regulatory Quality707070707070707070
Rule of Law737373737373737373
Voice & Accountability707070707070707070

Governance Score Over Time

Q1 2007 — Q4 2024

Data Quality Assessment

Full assessment

Indicator Data Point Status

IndicatorSourceUpdate FrequencyData PointsStatus
Agricultural InsuranceDALRRD / Stats SAQuarterly0/0Missing
Control of CorruptionWorld Bank (WGI)Annual9/9Active
Government EffectivenessWorld Bank (WGI)Annual9/9Active
Political StabilityWorld Bank (WGI)Annual9/9Active
Regulatory QualityWorld Bank (WGI)Annual9/9Active
Rule of LawWorld Bank (WGI)Annual9/9Active
Voice & AccountabilityWorld Bank (WGI)Annual9/9Active

Methodology

Full methodology

Weight

5%

Indicators

7

Scoring Method

Min-max normalization with weighted aggregation. Directionality aligned so higher = better food security.

Related Research

Food Security Programmes Database

Explore 35 food security programmes covering R263.1B in budget across all provinces.